Author: TeamARCDS

Given the capabilities of AI, which are a double-edged sword – equally powerful for launching attacks as for defence – should we take preventive measures or continue to leave our critical assets exposed?

Is it a matter of urgency to stop leaving critical or sensitive assets accessible, protected solely by software security, or should we wait and hope that the positive uses of AI will outweigh the negative ones?

An excellent article by OnePoint, written in collaboration with EGE’s business intelligence experts on this topic.

https://www.groupeonepoint.com/fr/nos-publications/intelligence-artificielle-et-cybersecurite-risques-ou-opportunites/

Credit: Onepoint

The 3-2-1 rule recommended three copies of data across two different media types, with one copy stored off-site. Originally proposed by Peter Krogh, this rule needs to be adapted to reflect current risk trends. In an ever-expanding and interconnected digital landscape, more advanced backup strategies are emerging to meet these needs. Veeam promotes the 3-2-1-1-0 rule, which fulfils the objective of ensuring data recovery through the diversification of storage copies. By incorporating these principles into their practices, organisations can guarantee the security and availability of their data in a dynamic digital environment.

Recommendations 3-2-1-1-0:

– 3 copies of the data

– Across two different media

– Including 1 off-site copy

– And a physical copy that is offline

– And no errors during the restoration tests

https://www.veeam.com/blog/321-backup-rule.html

Credit: Veeam